EMPOWERING TEACHERS: SOME INSIGHTS ON IMPROVING TEACHER EFFICACY

  • Pushkarni Panchamukhi RV University
Keywords: Teacher efficacy, teacher effectiveness, cultural capital, edification reproduction, National Education Policy, India

Abstract

The focus of policy makers in India is gradually shifting from improving access to improving the quality of education. There is little debate in literature on the significance and instrumental role of teachers in achieving educational outcomes, improving test score of students or raising their overall wellbeing. However, there is much debate on how to evaluate their effectiveness and what are the various factors that determine their effectiveness. The objective of this paper is to specifically investigate the various factors that determine the efficacy of teachers in improving the quality of education. After classifying these factors into three broad categories termed as systemic factors, school-specific factors and individual specific factors, we bring in the concept of cultural capital given by Bourdieu and apply it specifically for teachers. Parallel to Bourdieu’s idea of social reproduction, we introduce the term ‘edification reproduction’ to explain how beliefs, perceptions and practices about teaching get transmitted across generations creating a divide in the society. Finally, we discuss some of the proposals for teachers made by the National Education Policy, 2020 and connect with how they address the self-efficacy perceptions among teachers in India. We conclude with remarks on how early training for teacher could help develop self-efficacy among teachers.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ashton, P. (1985). Motivation and teacher's sense of efficacy. Research on motivation in education, 2, 141-174.
2. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. (1982, March). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: Toward an ecological model. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
3. Azam, M., & Kingdon, G. G. (2015). Assessing teacher quality in India. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 74-83.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.

5. Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1994). Self-efficacy.

6. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

7. Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital.(1986). Cultural theory: An anthology, 1, 81-93.

8. Canales, A., & Maldonado, L. (2018). Teacher quality and student achievement in Chile: Linking teachers' contribution and observable characteristics. International journal of educational development, 60, 33-50.
9. Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. Quality of life for people with disabilities: Models, research and practice.
10. Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American educational research journal, 31(3), 627-643.
11. McLaughlin, M. W., & Marsh, D. D. (1990). Staff development and school change. Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now, 213-232.
12. Ministry of Human Resource Develoment, GOI. (2019). Draft National Education Policy 2019. New Delhi: Government of India.
13. Ministry of Human Resource Develoment, GOI. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. New Delhi: Government of India.
14. Unicef. (2000). Defining Quality in Education: A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of The International Working Group on Education. Florence: UNICEF, 6.
15. Rampal, A. (2000). Education for human development in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 2623-2631.
Published
2022-03-10
How to Cite
Panchamukhi, P. (2022). EMPOWERING TEACHERS: SOME INSIGHTS ON IMPROVING TEACHER EFFICACY. IJRDO- Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.53555/er.v8i2.4913