MEANING OBSCURITIES IN LECTURER-STUDENT COMMUNICATION

  • MUPEMBA KABWE KANTANDA INSTITUT SUPERIEUR PEDAGOGIQUE DE MBUJIMAYI
Keywords: meaning obscurities, lecturer-Student Communication, utterances, misleading, vague, ambiguous, and obscure

Abstract

Abstract

Effective teaching and learning depend on meaningful communication between the lecturer and the students. Unfortunately, while lecturing some meaning obscurities occur in the utterances. This fact is really a serious problem which necessitates a deep study so as to make the communication between lecturers and students more effective. This problem leads to this research question: “why are there meaning obscurities in Lecturer-Student Communication?”. To answer this research question, it is necessary to examine the utterances that occur in the Lecturer-Student Communication. Therefore, the aim of this article is to examine utterances occurring in the Lecturer-Student Communication so as to point out the meaning obscurities and their causes in Lecturer-Student Communication. To achieve this aim, 200 utterances were collected during the classroom observations in order to examine them on the basis of the lexical, compositional, utterance, and content analyses. This is to say, each of 200 utterances was analyzed at the level of lexical, compositional, and utterance so as to discover the meaning obscurities and their causes. After the analyses, the content analysis was used to classify the utterances with respect to Searle’s classification. The results revealed that the meaning obscurities occurring in the utterances are caused by misleading, vague, ambiguous, and obscure expressions. The discussion explains all these expressions so as to answer the research question related to the problem before the suggestions of effective strategies are given to avoid meaning obscurities in Lecturer-Student Communication.

Key words: meaning obscurities, lecturer-Student Communication, utterances, misleading, vague, ambiguous, and obscure

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References
Abedini, M et al. (2013). The effective factors on the communication between students and faculty members from student’s prospective in Birjand University of Medical Sciences in “Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences” pp. 94 – 98
Ahmad, A. and R. Sahak. (2009). Teacher-Student Attachment And Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Work in “Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan” Vol. 24, pp. 55–72 online
Andewi1,W. and W. Waziana (2019). An Analysis of Teacher’s Speech Acts in Teaching and Learning Process in “TEKNOSASTIK” Volume 17 (1) pp. 29-34 Online
Asrar, Z. (2018). The Impact of Communication Between Teachers and Students: A Case Study of the Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Karachi, Pakistan in “European Scientif Journal”. Vol. 14 N° 16 Doi:10.19044/esj.2018.v14n16p32 pp: 32-38
Asudeh, A. (2018). Grammar and Meaning. Rochester: University of Rochester
Ayua, G.A. (2017). Effective Teaching Strategies. Workshop Paper, 7th September. Science Education Unit Department of Curriculum and Teaching Benue State University, Makurdi. Online
Brotherfish. (2018). Lexical and Compositional Semantics. Online
Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016
Farahiana, M. and M. Rezaeeb .(2012). A case study of an EFL teacher’s type of questions: an investigation into classroom interaction. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.631
Farrell, T. S. (2009).Talking, listening, and teaching: A guide to classroom communication. Canada: Corwin.
Green, M. (2016). Speech Acts. Connecticut: University of Connecticut
Han, B. and Tosten, R. (2016). In-class teacher-student communication according to high school students’ perceptions in “New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences” Issue 11, pp190-198
Hattan, C. (2019). Prompting Rural Students’ Use of Background Knowledge and Experience to Support Comprehension of Unfamiliar Content in “International Literacy Association”. USA: Illinois State University, Normal
Katz, M. (2015). Politeness theory and the classification of speech acts in “Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria” 25(2), 45–55 Victoria: University of Victoria.
Khan et al. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and its role in the Development of the Students’ Academic success in “Journal of Education and Practice” Vol. 8, N° 1 pp 18-21
Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A. (2007). Organizational behavior. Arizona: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Kroeger, R.P. (2018). Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Berlin: Language Science Press
Mupemba, K.K.E. (2019). Meaning in Doctor-Patient Communication: A case Study. Unpublished M.A. Dissertation. Kinshasa (DRC) University of Kinshasa.
New Directions for Teaching and Learning. (2011). Social Sciences Education. Wiley Blacwell. Online
Perini-Santos, E. (2017). Does the Principle of Compositionality Explain Productivity? For a Pluralist View of the Role of Formal Languages as Models in “CEUR Proceedings of the Workshop on Contexts in Philosophy”. Paris: CEUR pp. 108-120
Rawat, M.D. (2015). Importance of Communication in Teaching Learning Process in “Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies”. ISSN 2278-8808 Online
Rido, A. and Sari, F.M. (2018). Characteristics of Classroom Interaction of English Language Teachers in Indonesia and Malaysia in “International Journal of Language Education” Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 40-50 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.5246
Rubio, C.M. (2009). Effective Teachers –Professional And Personal Skills in “ENSAYOS. Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete” Nº 24, 2009, (35-46) ISSN 2171-9098 ∙
Searle, J.R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts in “Language in Society” Cambrigde: Cambrigde University Press. vol. 5 N°1 pp. 1-23
Siddig, B.E. and Y. A. AlKhoudary .(2018). Investigating Classroom Interaction: Teacher and Learner Participation in “English Language Teaching”. Vol. 11, No. 12; 2018 ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
Sivakumar, R. (2018). Teachers Attitude Towards Teaching Profession in Relation to Their Self Concept in “Journal of Contemporary Educational Research and Innovations” Vol.8, No.3, pp.283-288., May ISSN 2249-9636 (Online) ISSN 2250-0618 (Print)
Stringer, D. (2019). Lexical Semantics: Relativity and Transfer. USA: Indiana University Bloomington
Suzić, R. (2013). Student-Teacher Communication in “University Teaching in Sino-US English Teaching”, ISSN 1539-8072 January 2013, Vol. 10, No. 1, 65-71
Talib, N.B. et al. (2017). The Importance of Lecturer Voice Elements in “Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship”. Vol. 3 N° 6 p. 23-31 ISSN 24621714
Umar, T.F. (2016). The Analysis of Speech Act of President Joko Widodo at APEC Forum. Thesis. English and Literature Department Adab and Humanity Faculty Alauddin State Islamic University Makassar
Published
2021-06-10
How to Cite
KABWE KANTANDA, M. (2021). MEANING OBSCURITIES IN LECTURER-STUDENT COMMUNICATION. IJRDO- Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.53555/er.v6i6.4295