EVOLUTION ET COMPARAISON DES RENDEMENTS QUANTITATIFS DES RESULTATS AUX EXAMENS D’ETAT DES ECOLES OFFICIELLE ET CONVENTIONNEES CATHOLIQUES DE LA VILLE DE KISANGANI DE 2008 à 2013 « CAS DE L’OPTION MATHEMATIQUE-PHYSIQUE
Abstract
Evolution and comparison of quantitative yields (out put) of state exams of official and catholic schools in Kisangani town untill 2008 up 2013.
The success on the state exams of Maths, the success on superior studies and the learning to work, other disciplines constitut without doupt the most preocupation of all pupils at scientific humanities.
It must be important to have knowledge of some definitions and fondamental theorms around which articulate the whole courses, the knowledge of the important results of Maths, the aptitude to the personnal research and knowledge which atlous to make resolution of various problems.
In all secondary Teaching Institution which organizes the full cycle, the success to the state exam affects (interest) and always attracts most pupils. Schools which organize the option Maths-physicals in Kisangani have each school year decrease of candidates in relationship to other schools which organize other options as general pedagogy, social…
The misssing of library, laboratories, and the appropriate training of Math and adopted in definite official and catholic schools which allow the evolution of sciences and technology have created an empty in the mind of pupils disorganized the work of teacher.
The publication of this work is a hope, because the definite solution in this big problem require coherent and global pedagogical look after.
In marketing tjis work, our worry is to compare the evolution of the global results to the state exams of the Maths-physical option of catholic and oicial schools inKisangani town between 2008-2018 and ater to compare their quantitative yields.
Downloads
References
(2)ALBOU, P,Les questionnaires psychologiques, Paris, FUF, XJ, 1976
(3) BANGIDA,D, Etude comparative du rendement quantitatif aux examens d’Etat entre les écoles protestantes et privées,option philo et lettre de la ville de Kisangani, monographie, inédit ISTM/KISANGANI, 2008
(4) BARDIN, L,Analyse de contenu, Paris, PUF, 1986.
(5) BINDUNGWA,M,Comment élaborer un travail de fin de cycle, KINSHASA, 2008
(6) CARDINET, J,Evaluation scolaire et pratique,Bruxelles,De BOECK,WESMAAEL, 1986.
(7) DE KETELE, J.M,Evaluation du savoir-être, L’évaluation approche descriptive ou, Bruxelles, de BOECK, WESMAAEL, 1986.
(8) Dictionnaire universel (…), 1988,
(9) DE LANDSHEER,Evaluation continue et examen : Précisionde docimologie, Paris, Nathan, 6ème édition, 1986.
(10) GRAWITZ,MADEDELE,Méthode des sciences sociales,Paris,DALLOZ,2èd, 1974.
(11) LE THAN KHOI, Industrie de l’enseignement, Paris, édition de MINUIT, 1967
(12) FOURASTIE, Mathématique et statistique, option économie, librairie de la GRAVEFrace, 1976
(13) OLEKO, D,Etude Evolutive des résultats des élèves de sixièmes années des humanités commerciales et administratives aux Examens d’Etat, Mémoire inédit, ISP/KISANGANI,2008.
(14) WISS, J,Vers une conception cohérente de l’évolution pour la scolarité obligatoire en Suisse et au Tessin, une évolution appendre et pour choisir :Voies et moyen, Neuchâtel, IRDP, 1996.
Copyright (c) 2019 IJRDO - Journal of Educational Research (ISSN: 2456-2947)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
