THE NEXUS BETWEEN COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN CONSERVATION AND LAND COVER CHANGE IN KAKAMEGA FOREST, KENYA

  • Agweyu Laura Geography Department, Mount Kenya University
  • Dr. Raphael Mulaha Kweyu Geography Department, Kenyatta University.
  • Dr. Kibutu Thomas Geography Department, Kenyatta University
Keywords: nexus, community forest associations, forest cover change, conservation

Abstract

Participatory Forest Management (PFM) is essential for sustainable forest management as it’s based on the assumption that the forest provide both tangible and intangible goods to forest adjacent dwellers. In Kenya PFM is provided under the Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016). The law is meant to ensure that degradation of forests was halted but at the same time forest adjacent communities benefit from forest goods and services. A lot of studies have been carried out on the extend of forest cover change in major forest towers but there is limited information on the relationship between community participation in forest conservation and its effect on forest cover change on Kakamega Forest. The level of water has reduced gradually in some of the rivers whose source is Kakamega forest due to forest cover loss. The study targeted FAC that included CFA members at 5km radius from the forest edge in Shinyalu, Kenya Forest Service (KFS) officers, and Community Based Organization (CBO) leaders. The target population on land cover change information was composed of images acquired from 1998 to 2018. A sample size of 187 CFA members was selected using simple random and purposive sampling method was used to select 7 CBO leaders and one KFS officer. Data was collected using questionnaires, focused group discussions, interview schedules and remotely sensed satellite images. Data from questionnaires was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software i.e.-frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations and presented in form of tables. Medium resolution satellite data was analysed both spatially and statistically. Spatially, the extent of the area covered by different land cover types in Kakamega Forest in 2000, 2008 and 2018 was captured on different satellite image data sets using Geographical Information System (GIS) software. The study findings revealed that various Kakamega forest land classes increased between 2000-2008 due to CFA activities like afforestation, reforestation and agroforestry but the forest cover declined within the period of 2008-2018 except grassland vegetation which increased all through. Study findings indicate that some of the activities that increased the forest cover included afforestation, reforestation and agroforestry Training of more CFA scouts and deployment of additional rangers to man the vast forest alongside creating awareness through chief baraza to the local community on the need for conserving kakamega forest was recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya D, Khanal DR, Bhattarai HP, Gautam B, Karki G, Trines E, GoorWvan, Acharya RP (2015). REDD+ strategy for Nepal.Wageningen: face the future. The Netherlands.
Agevi, H, W. M., & Tsingalia, H. (2014). Community Forest Associations and Community- Based Organizations : Redesigning their Roles in Forest Management and Conservation in Kenya Community Forest Associations and Community- Based Organizations : Redesigning their Roles in Forest Management and C. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR, 3(september), 1916–1922.
Bruggeman D, Meyfroidt P and LambinEF(2016). Forest cover changes in Bhutan: Revisiting the forest transition. Applied Geography 67:49–66.
Chakravarty S, GhoshSK, Suresh CP, Dey AN, ShuklaG. (2012) Deforestation: causes, effects and control strategies. In: Okia CA, ed. Global perspectives on sustainable forest management. Rijeka :In Tech.
Cheboiwo, J. K. (2017). Role of Devolved Governance in Enhancing Incentives in Participatory Role of Devolved Governance in Enhancing Incentives in Participatory Forest Management in Kenya. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 7(July), 1–6
Chomba, S.; Nathan, I.; Minang, P.A.; Sinclair, F. Illusions of empowerment? Questioning policy and practice of community forestry in Kenya. Ecol. Soc. 2015, 20, 2. [CrossRef
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation (2012). State of the World’s Forest; FAO: Rome, Italy,
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015). Global forest resources assessment. Forestry Paper No.1. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations.
GOK (Government of Kenya) (2016). Forest Conservation and Management Act. Government printer. Nairobi, Kenya.
GOK (Government of Kenya)(2016).Water Act. Government printers
Humphrey, A., Koros, H., Humphrey, A., Adamba, M. K., Hillary, K., &Carolyne, M. (2016). PELIS Forestry Programme as a Strategy for Increasing Forest Cover and Improving Community Livelihoods: Case of Malava Forest, W .... PELIS Forestry Programme as a Strategy for Increasing Forest Cover and Improving Community Livelihoods: Case of Malava. American Journal of Agricultures and Forestry, 4, No.5(October), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20160405.13
KFS (Kenya Forest Service) (2016). Participatory Forest Management Guidelines. Kenya Forest Service Nairobi, Kenya. KFS. Kenya Forest Service. Available online: http://www.kenyaforestservice. org(accessedon10April2016).
KFS (Kenya Forest Service) (2015) Kakamega Forest Strategic Ecosystem Management Plan, 2015-2040),
Kimutai ,D.K, & Watanabe, T. (2016). Forest-Cover Change and Participatory Forest Management of the Lembus Forest , Kenya Forest-Cover Change and Participatory Forest Management of the Lembus Forest , Kenya. Enviroments, 3(July). https://doi.org/10.3390/environments3030020
Kisssinger GM, Herold M, DeSyV. (2012). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: a synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers. Vancouver: Lexeme Consulting.
Lawler, J. H., & Bullock, R. C. L. (2017). A Case for Indigenous Community Forestry, (March). https://doi.org/10.5849/jof
Matiku., Caleb, M., Callistus, O. 2013. The Impact of Participatory Forest Management on Local Community Livelihoods in the Arabuko‑Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Conservation and Society. 11(2), 112-129.
MeyfroidtPLambinEF(2008)The causes of the reforestation inVietnam.Land Use Policy 25(2):182–197 DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.001.
Ming,ate, M., Lamech, F., Letema, S., & Obiero, K. (2016). Designing a Functioning Community Forest Association : A Case of Muileshi , Kakamega County , Kenya. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(5), 1209–1216.
Musyoki, J.K., Mugwe, J. Matundu, K. and Muchiri, M. (2013).Determinants of householddecisions to join community Forest Association. A case study of Kenya.Forestry.2013.
Mutune JM, Wahome RG, Mungai DN (2015). Local Participation in Community Forest Associations: A Case Study of Sururu and Eburu Forests, Kenya. Int. J. Afr. Asian Stud. 13:1-13
Nagendra, H.; Karmacharya, M.; Karna, B. Evaluating forest management in Nepal: Views across space and time. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10, 24.
Njenga, M., Karanja, N., Cristel M., Miyuki, I., Neufeldt, H., Kithinji, J. and Jamnadass, R. (2013): Charcoal production and strategies to enhance its sustainability in Kenya, Development in Practice, 23:3, 359-371
RoK (REPUBLIC OF KENYA) (2018).Taskforce Report on Forest Resources Management and Logging Activities in Kenya
Wambugu, E. W., Obwoyere, G. O., & Kirui, B. K. (2018). Socioeconomic Factors that determine community participation in forest management and conservation of adjacent ecosystems : A case of Aberdare forest , Kenya. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment, 9(November), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.5897/JENE2017.0666
Young JC, Jordan A, Searle KR, Butler A, Chapman, D. S., Simmons P, Watt AD (2013). Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biol. Cons. 158:359-370.
Published
2020-09-23
How to Cite
Laura, A., Dr. Raphael Mulaha Kweyu, & Dr. Kibutu Thomas. (2020). THE NEXUS BETWEEN COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN CONSERVATION AND LAND COVER CHANGE IN KAKAMEGA FOREST, KENYA. IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 5(9), 01-18. https://doi.org/10.53555/sshr.v5i9.3870